Log in

Note of the Living Deb [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Doctor List [May. 28th, 2016|01:46 pm]
[Tags|, ]

Although I've been quite lucky in my good health throughout my life, I've now decided it would be a good idea to start keeping track of all my many doctors. I have eleven I can think of right now:
* general practitioner
* eye doctor
* dentist
* oral surgeon - because I eat sugar and my wisdom teeth don't fit properly
* endocrinologist - for past thyroid issues
* the surgeon who did my half thyroidectomy
* radiologist - for mammograms
* gastroenterologist - for colonoscopies
* physical therapist - for past ankle and shoulder problems
* dermatologist
* Mohs surgeon - for the new basal cell carcinomas on my nose (this is the non-scary kind of skin cancer)

That's not to mention my insurance companies (health and dental), my pharmacy (and mail pharmacy), and the people who deal with blood work.

Just keeping track of their names is good so I can find them again if needed, though I'm also including contact information. Adding notes about them like who to talk to about various issues (like the insurance expert at my dentist's office) and whether and why I like them is also good.

Many of y'all probably have me beat on the number of doctors and other health workers you see and you have my condolences. The human body is amazing, but it can often use some help. I'm glad we have so many experts available to counsel on and provide this help, especially when they actually understand our problems and know how to fix them or at least relieve them.
linkpost comment

On Host Families [May. 25th, 2016|09:40 pm]

We just learned that during the Granada part of our study abroad class, we will be staying with host families rather than in a dorm as previously described.

Lately I seem to be taking all news badly at first and this was no exception. Oh, no! I will have to speak Spanish to them and I can't! And I'm set in my ways now! And they probably expect a twenty-year-old!

Okay, really I know that staying with host families is awesome and that we will learn so much more about Spanish language and culture than we ever would staying in a dorm with a bunch of other foreign students. So really, this is a great development.

But families are made out of people, and we won't know what they're like. So I've been reading up on it. Guess the number one reason people host students.

Ready with your guess?

It's to earn money. So, we'll be like foster children.

Okay, no, that makes sense and is perfectly reasonable. And the other reasons are because they think it will be fun in some way. The ones with kids think it will be good for the kids. The old ones think it will be nice to have company. That sort of thing. The important thing is to communicate well and try to get along and be understanding and flexible, things that, at least in English, I am good with.

Another idea is to think about all the ways I am odd and set in my ways to help me prepare myself for living with strangers. I normally think I'm a pretty flexible person, but am I? (I used to think I was energetic before I worked at summer camp.) I am used to:

* eating pretty much whatever I want and I'm super picky - now I will be eating whatever the family is eating (this is the scariest - they could expect me to eat giant cockroaches from the sea for example)

* eating whenever I want - now it will be three meals a day and very few snacks (probably okay; I probably won't get so hungry that I can't pay attention as much as I want to--I won't be at work!)

* eating however much I want - Spaniards might be like Italians with the feeding = love culture (I already weigh more than I need to)

* having a live-in boyfriend - yeah, that's not going to be happening

* telling the truth - will little white lies be expected?

* dressing casually - supposedly you can tell tourists because they're wearing shorts and white sneakers (it's probably okay to wear my regular clothes and look like a tourist, so long as my shoulders are covered if I want to go into a church; I won't have to wear high heels and make-up or anything)

* joking around - I won't know the language well enough to do this most of the time (I might start to feel lonely, but I'll get to see Robin daily, so that should be okay)

* a bunch of American cultural stuff I don't even realize

I don't think I care about laundry differences, cleanliness differences, sharing a room with a host daughter, having to be decently covered to get to the bathroom, or having to share a bathroom. But I'm sure there will be issues of some kind.

Plus I'll have to bring a gift. Something that is typical of where I'm from and can be a nice memento for them. That hopefully they would like. No clue.

(My first thought was Texas-shaped tortilla chips and salsa. Or some hideous longhorn tourist thingy. Uh, no. Bluebonnet refrigerator magnet? Banana chocolate chip pancake recipe?)

I'm just reminding myself--it's better than boot camp or other military living arrangements, it's better than prison, and it's better than being a foster kid (as a minor). And it's only a week and a half.

Plus, I kind of miss having new roommates all the time--learning new ways to do things and new recipes. And maybe it really will be awesome. (Though I do better psychologically if I go in with low expectations and thus am more likely to have the surprises be pleasant ones.)
link2 comments|post comment

On Individualism [May. 10th, 2016|09:07 pm]

A friend of mine said that when she went to Argentina, it felt like home. When I asked why, she said that one reason was that everyone moved their hands a lot when they talked. She does this also (though not as much), but that embarrasses her mother who wants her to sit on her hands. So it was kind of exhiliarating for her to see that.

Another reason is that Argentinians are not into individualism as much as we are. So they have extended families and they are more community-minded. And she feels that America's love of individualism leaves people to have to do things by themselves, and when they fail, they get blamed for not trying hard enough.

I had never thought of that before. But I've definitely heard of pulling yourself up by your bootstraps. And of people not realizing that some people are living life on a much easier game setting than others.

As for me, I am a huge fan of individualism (for myself). I do get to live life on almost the easiest setting possible, so I don't have any problems associated with that (unloving parents, racism, sexism, serious health problems, etc.).

And I love that I get to live my life the way I want to. I mean an extended family sounds fine, but it would be my family. Much as I love my family, and I do love them all greatly, I prefer my current living situation.

Also, I don't want kids, and I don't have to have them. In an extended family, of course my nieces would be running around all the time.

And I don't have to go to church (or synagogue). And my lover can be the gender I want. And we can move away from our home towns (I much prefer Austin to Chicago except possibly in August). And if I want a low-stress job even though it's low-paying and low-status, that mostly affects just me. And all kinds of stuff like that.

Yet though the U.S. still has an individualistic mentality, now it is being tied to the idea that everyone should be the same anyway. The far right wing sure wishes that everyone should be sticking to the gender assigned to them at birth, waiting for sex until marriage, marrying someone of the opposite sex, having kids with them, not having abortions, attending church, not getting divorced, and not getting on welfare or needing food stamps.

Yes, in a perfect world where everyone wanted that, and where there were no fetal problems or rape, etc., this would probably be nice. But not everyone wants that. Even people who do want that sometimes change their minds about part of it as they go through life. So that is not what the U.S. is supposed to be about! We are supposed to be multi-cultural! And live-and-let-live!

Semi-related Quote of the Day

R - It's so annoying when people want everyone to be just like what they changed into. [Example: some people who no longer smoke]

D - That's still better than when people want everyone to be just like they wish they were, but they're not, and they feel guilty, so they take it out on everyone else. [Example: some closet gay people]

Other Quote of the Day

D (after Cruz dropped out of the primaries) - The good news is Ted Cruz won't be president.


D (later) - I'm now thinking that if Trump becomes President, he will quickly get angry about Congress not doing everything exactly how he wants and he will stomp his feet and resign. (And try to sue them all.) So maybe he wouldn't be so bad after all. It depends who he picks for vice president.

Looks like he's picked Ted Cruz. Okay, nevermind.
linkpost comment

Work Travel [May. 6th, 2016|12:16 pm]

My brother, who works at a call center, is going to get to travel for his job, to help train people in another call center. In Bosnia. Suddenly I am curious about this country. When you've only heard of a country from being in the news, that's a bad sign, but it seems better now. And has beautiful old buildings. He hopes to take many pictures and share them on Facebook. Yea!

Quote of the Day

On identifying words as adjectives: "I always just go with the "can this word be used to modify a ____ (fill in blank with any noun - for me, that's usually a cat)" method!" - Eco Cat Lady in a comment in her amusing I Don't Think You Said What You Think You Said
linkpost comment

On Public Restrooms [May. 3rd, 2016|11:39 pm]
[Tags|, ]

First of all, why are public rest rooms an issue? That's weird.

Second, what I think is the weird thing about public rest rooms is not what's in the news but that they are a thing which is still kind of "separate but equal" in modern times. Why do we even have that?

Our society is weird about nudity, yet it thinks people of the same sex should be allowed to be nude in public together in locker rooms. And share dorm rooms. And that same kind of thinking is probably involved in rest room philosophies. I mean, I guess some people re-arrange their clothing in rest rooms, so I guess it's similar. Plus men actually pee right out in the open. But I really don't see why we don't just have female-like rest rooms (stalls for everybody) and let everyone use them.

Third, I was realizing that I never notice anything about the other people in a public rest room with me except their locations. I am looking for a vacant sink at which to wash my hands, for example, so I really am noticing the spaces between the people. (I do the same thing on buses and can pass right by people I know without noticing them!)

One exception: My favorite restaurant has giant cardboard cut-outs of famous people and they put the male one in the female rest room and vice versa for some reason. I admit to panicking a bit when I saw a man in the rest room, but my first though was, "Oops, am I in the wrong rest room?"

And finally, I wish I could think of a good way to show solidarity with people who have to think about which rest room to use. When Nazis made Jews wear yellow stars, other people could wear yellow stars in solidarity. But I can't think of anything like that for this situation. Normally I can be quite creative, but it's just not coming to me.
link6 comments|post comment

Plumbing mysteries [Apr. 25th, 2016|09:20 pm]
[Tags|, ]

Many plumbing realities don't make sense to me.

Shower dangers

You know that thing where you're taking a shower and someone turns on a sink or flushes a toilet somewhere else in the house or perhaps the hotel room next door suddenly your shower is too hot? I think I get that. Some of the cold water in your carefully calibrated water flow has been diverted, so ouch.

What I don't get is why this never happens in my house. It's awesome. Apparently I have a remarkable feature known as good water pressure. I do not live at the bottom of a hill or anything. I don't know how I got this, but I love it.


Sometimes we used to get weird noises for which the technical term may be "dinosaurs in the pipes." Apparently when air gets trapped, these noises happen and you have to flush the system. Or something. I really don't get it. Are the pipes always sitting around full of water? I guess so. Except not drain pipes.

Dissipating hot water

Before starting my shower, I turn on the hot water in the bathtub. It comes out cold, which I understand--the water in the pipe between the water heater and the tub has cooled down. So I have to wait for the water from the water heater to push that out of the way until the freshly heated water arrives.

While I'm waiting, I'll sometimes do something else like brush my hair out, and so I don't just blast it but keep it on low. Slowly, the water turns itself into a trickle, and then maybe even completely off. I don't get that. I have not drained the water heater; the water is still cold even.

Increasing water volume

Shortly after we got our new water heater, we also got a new kitchen faucet.

I had a style that Robin refers to as "trailer house" and we haven't been able to find a good replacement until recently. We found an adequate replacement at the Habitat Re-Store a while back, but eventually decided to use only the hot water side because the cold water side was too hard to turn off.

But it got to where we couldn't turn the cold water off at all, so Robin looked again and found a replacement in a style he refers to as "restaurant." The store selling it calls it a wall-mounted swivel faucet. You can see a picture at Webstaurant Store.

This worked out great, but sometimes when we turn the hot water on, it turns itself on more and more. I can watch the lever moving. Sometimes it can go from a tiny trickle to blasting (and maybe more, but I'm afraid to wait any longer). It's hard to rinse your dishes when you can use only one hand so you can control the water flow with the other hand. This happens only sometimes, and only with the hot water.

Robin theorizes that the water pressure is so great that it can turn our now smoothly moving faucet handle. Maybe as it gets older and stickier, this problem will go away.
linkpost comment

On Homeowner's Insurance [Apr. 13th, 2016|11:17 pm]
[Tags|, , ]

When buying homeowner's insurance, the recommendation is to insure your house for the amount it would cost to re-build it.

So how much is that? I started with the default amount my insurance company suggested the first year. And then every year you can keep insuring for the same or for a higher value they add, and I've been choosing the higher value about half the time.

Actually, that's probably just flood insurance. It looks like my homeowner's insurance is adjusted upward each year automatically.

Personal finance blog advice

Personal finance blogs say you might be over-insuring because construction costs could be much less than the market value of your house which includes both the value of the buildings and the value of the land (location, location, location).

My tax office actually sends out notices of the appraised value of the property and they even break it down into categories. The relevant categories for my house are "structure and improvement market value" and "market value of non ag/timber land." So I could choose the value given for the "structure and improvement" part only.

However, an interesting thing happened between 2013 and 2014. Apparently they realized that gentrification was happening, so they raised the land value from 55K to 100K. And at the same time they lowered the structure value from 110K to 95K. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that construction costs did not plummet during this period.

I've tried googling construction costs in my city. If I could find average construction costs per square foot, that would be very helpful. But no. I can't find any such metric, and people asking this question always get answers that say it depends, with either no numbers or ranges so huge as to be worthless.

But at my last neighborhood association meeting, I picked up some meeting minutes from the Austin Neighborhoods Council that says "the total cost of new housing units in Austin is now averaging at least $245 per square foot (construction by itself representing $175 of that cost)." Score!

Suddenly I want to do comparisons:
* Latest appraised value of my house (last July) = $125K structures
* Square footage of my house times $175/square foot average = 960 x 175 = $168K.
* Amount of insurance I'm actually paying for = $133.5K dwelling + $13.K other structures = $146.5K
* Amount of flood insurance I'm paying for = $150K

And what about last year?
* appraised value = $95K structures
* homeowner's insurance = $144.7K
* flood insurance = $150K

So I seem to be paying between the appraised value and this researched amount--so maybe not enough, but not as little as it could easily be.

Anyway, this quote was summarizing something a guy named Wendler said based on a study his development firm made on housing affordability. Well, he won't be doing a study every year. And how much can I trust a development firm--I don't know if his is one of the slimy ones, or even if there's such a thing as non-slimy development firms. Oops, my bias is showing. Sorry, decent development firms!

Interestingly, this time when I googled construction costs in Austin I found the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board's Construction Costs Standards. These show "New Construction Average Cost per Square Foot plus One Standard Deviation" for various types of construction such as labs, food service, and parking lots. No telling how much a standard deviation is or even why they would just add that on. But they update these every year. They don't list houses, but they do list "Housing, Apartments," which should be a little cheaper. And the amount they list is $179, very close to the $175 value in the study.

So I could look here each year to keep up with inflation. (Last year the figure was $171.) I can always look up inflation in general, but construction inflation may be very different.

Of course this is for the whole state; I'm not sure how well other college towns are correlated with mine. I'm pretty sure Houston and Dallas used to be more expensive and now they are less expensive.

Insurance company advice

According to Forbes:

Insurance experts say failing to have enough insurance to cover the cost of rebuilding your house if it’s destroyed is the biggest mistake homeowners make. Amy Bach, executive director of the consumer advocacy group United Policyholders, says one 2009 study found that two-thirds of U.S. homes are underinsured.

Why? For one thing, many homeowners buy only enough insurance to cover the amount of their mortgage. But the mortgage may be, at most, 80 or 90 percent of the value of the house, depending on the original down payment (less, if the home has appreciated in value).

For another, some policyholders insure an amount equal to the current value of their homes. But this figure may be far less than the actual cost of rebuilding your house, including labor and supplies (and both of those may rise sharply after a storm when there’s big demand and short supply).

What should you do? First, calculate how much it would cost to rebuild your house.

You could ask your insurance agent, but Bach encourages you to use a professional home-replacement cost estimator, who’d likely provide a more accurate number. The fee can run about $300, but some insurers offer this service for free to their high-value customers.

Ugh, and double ugh. Of course I expect insurance companies to say you should buy more. But they have a real point about everything costing more right when you need it. (Well, it's probably worse for hurricanes and earthquakes, that we don't get, than floods and tornadoes and fires.)

For the second ugh, I am not paying $300 per year to get this estimate; that's many months worth of premiums. Nor am I willing to be a high-value customer to, well, anyone.

Vaguely related information

According to those same meeting minutes, Wendler's study defined affordable as "a price of no more that $312,000 which is said to be what a family making 150% of the median family income might be able to afford." That implies that a family making the median family income "might be able to afford" a $208,000 house. Half the population can't even afford that. So $312K is a pretty whacked definition for "affordable."

The minutes continue: "In the 78704 area the study found that the prices of housing ranged from a low of $300,000 to $750,000 with the lower end all being what he called 'tiny' units of 500 sq. feet or less. In the 78702 area, the prices ranged from $300,000 to $600,000 with again the lower priced being 'very small.' In both areas Wendler said his study found that the closest thing to 'affordable' housing units were either existing older single family houses or older apartment units--both of which are being torn down to make room for newer higher cost housing."

I used to think that new housing means more supply which means lower prices. But the new housing I see is ALL "luxury" housing and I'm rarely in the two zip codes mentioned above. Market economics means those things should stay empty until the prices come down and people should quit building that stuff, or at least the prices of the older stuff should go down, but that's not how it's working. I mean, if things aren't affordable, where are people living? They don't all have millions of roommates like in NYC. Do they just spend 1/2 or 2/3 of their income on housing? Thus making it harder for other businesses to get customers?

So how about you guys? Those of you who are home owners, have you thought about the amount to insure your house for and, if so, how do you make your decision?
link6 comments|post comment

On Vertical Storage [Apr. 11th, 2016|03:24 pm]
[Tags|, ]

Empirical Question posted a link to Honestly Modern's Spark Joy: One Simple Change to Organize Your Space. The author recommends storing things vertically. This way they are easier to see and to get at. They also have a smaller horizontal footprint.

One problem with storing things vertically is that they might not balance very well. Looking around my house, I see various strategies for helping things stay vertical.

Rigid Things

When things are rigid, just having something to lean against can be a big help. For example:

* Bookends and edges of bookshelves - Good for books, notebooks, CDs, and DVDs of course. We also use this strategy for some games and some toolboxes.
* Containers - We use mugs for pencils and scissors and a pitcher for kitchen utensils. Some people use cups for paintbrushes or make-up brushes or silverware. Sometimes you can find just the right sized box to store your plastic lids in vertically. The author of Honestly Modern now uses magazine holders for papers.
* Racks - We use plate racks to hold cutting boards, cookie sheets, and serving platters. I use a mail rack to hold envelopes into which I put receipts (one envelope per month). We also have pot lid racks.
* Walls - You can lean pictures or a cutting board against the wall. I also used to do this with my books before I owned bookshelves; I just lined them up against the baseboard like it was a bottom shelf.

Floppy Things

One strategy for dealing with floppy things is to make them less floppy. I think that's part of what bookbinding is all about, or even scrolls from the olden days. You can definitely prop scrolls up to store them. In fact, we roll our napkins and put them in a basket like flowers in a vase.

This is part of what people like about Marie Kondo's Spark Joy book. She shows you that you can fold things into smaller, more cubical shapes that can stand on their own better. I do now actually fold my knee socks into squares that can be lined up in my drawer.

Another strategy is to put floppy things in a space that's so small, they can't fall over. This is problematic when you actually use some of things, because then the other things can fall over into the vacated space. But a little slouching might not be a big deal--some people like magazine boxes, for example. The boxes that envelopes come in are like that. Or you can put dividers in so that nothing can take the spot of other things.

Another strategy is to hang floppy things so that gravity works for you instead of against you. For example:
* Hangers - Of course shirts, pants, and skirts are commonly hung, but you can also hang things like towels and tablecloths.
* File folders - The ones with the hanging rails are especially nice because you don't have to rely on stuffing the file drawer to keep things upright. You can use files for papers, but sometimes other things can work, like seed packets (especially if you have some way to keep them from falling out the sides).
* Towel bars - Robin uses one for ties and belts. We also have some in the kitchen with hooks to hang pots from.
* Tie racks - I hang accessories from these (mostly necklaces and glasses).
* Furniture - Many people drape clothing over chairs or exercise machines. I've also see people who do cross-stitch and needlepoint draping yarn lengths over a chair (or tying them to a hanger).
* Dark rooms and laundry lines - people clip things up to dry, and I've seen people string something like this against a wall to display greeting cards or their children's art.
* Laundry racks - Probably not too handy for storage because the bottom back rungs aren't very accessible.

Tiny things

Little things and liquids don't make very neat piles. So it's nice to put them in containers. And some things like cereal boxes are ideally suited for vertical storage--they're labelled on their sides and even stand alone. Glass jars are nice, too, because you can see the contents, and they also stand on their own.

Ideally it's easy to get the contents into and out of the containers. Spice jars are often designed to be able to either shake out the spices and/or use a measuring spoon. Some paper clip containers have a magnetized edge so it's easy to get one paper clip at a time.

Then you can line up the containers or corral them into bigger containers (like travel shower stuff).

Horizontal Storage

Of course sometimes horizontal storage is fine. When things stack well and they are identical, like plates, or functionally identical like different colored hand towels or library books ready to be returned, it's no problem that the bottom ones are easily accessible. And sometimes things nest well and it's pretty easy to get things even out of the middle of the nest.

And sometimes it's just best to store things flat. I have a stack of scratch paper that is wrinkle-free because I can store it flat. Printers store printer paper pretty flat, too. I've seen stacks of "in" boxes like bunk beds to let you be able to access different kinds of papers without going through the kinds of papers you don't want.

Do you have any favorite ways you store things vertically (or otherwise)?
linkpost comment

Review: "Zootopia" [Feb. 29th, 2016|11:44 pm]
[Tags|, ]

A friend had free tickets to "Zootopia," not to be confused with "Zoolander II," so I got to see it early. I recommend it.

I had seen and hated a preview consisting of one scene from the movie, but one other time I hated something I saw out of context, I liked it much better in context. So that could happen again, right? Highly unlikely. So I went mostly for the socializing.

It was crowded. There were a lot of kids; I steeled myself to be tolerant of screaming. We were too close to the screen--it took several minutes to get used to that. It was 3-D, but I didn't really notice the 3-D. So I was thinking that I don't even know why I see movies in theatres anymore. I really prefer cuddling in the living room in front of the computer screen that we watch movies on.

But some bits were funny. And sometimes hearing the other people laughing added to the experience. And one time I jumped, but my friend next to me jumped just as much, which made me laugh. I actually laughed out loud several times--in spite of myself. Not during the icky scene--when everyone else in the theatre was laughing basically continuously, but I could see that it was, indeed, better in context.

The movie is set in a land where animals have evolved to get along and the big city is where everyone can be whatever they want. All you have to do is try and keep trying--the usual kiddie movie message du jour. Except the city was completely racist and sexist (actually species-ist and career-ist, but using all the same kinds of horrible phrases) all the while either pretending not to be horrible or telling people to get real, this is the real world. It was kind of creepy.

But the actual story was good. The plot was great. The locale was gorgeous. Other people found the 3-D to greatly enhance several scenes. Most characters are likeable; all are interesting to look at. And there is plenty for grown-ups as well as kids.

There was one weird scene where the protagonists were freaked out by nudity. But the characters are animals, so it seems ridiculous to us viewers. Plus they have no genitals. But they are doing things that would make you uncomfortable if you are normally uncomfortable with the nudity of strangers who have genitals. I think this scene would affect adults more than children so that we all get the message that if something is scaring you or at least squicking you out, maybe you should think twice about where the problem lies.

Mostly it's a coming-of-age, cop-buddy movie, but also kind of sci-fi in a social science kind of way. You follow one character as she tries to follow her dream and you slowly find out the secrets behind some mysterious disappearances.

And, Empirical Question, the main character is a bunny. She doesn't hop like she should. Neither she nor her family quite have the right disapproving looks. And yet I still think you would like watching her.

I don't love everything about the movie, but I highly recommend seeing this movie and even seeing it in the theatres, maybe even in 3-D if you're into that. Even a theatre with kids in it.

Warning: there may be spoilers in the comments. Also. feel free to bring up spoilers in the comments.
link2 comments|post comment

Review: Blood on Snow [Feb. 28th, 2016|04:28 pm]
[Tags|, ]

Jo Nesbø's Blood on Snow: A Novel had a plot twist so surprising that I immediately re-read the book to see if I could see it coming (no), to see if I could figure out what really happened in some situations (yes for some, no for others), and to decide if I still liked the book (I think so) and the protagonist (probably).

It's mostly first-person narrative and the protagonist is a hit man. Early in the book he lists four jobs he's no good for, explains why, and then you realize he learned this the hard way. For example (I've added paragraph breaks for my reader(s) who has trouble without them):

I can't be used in robberies. I've read that more than half of all bank employees who experience a robbery end up with psychological problems afterwards, some of them for the rest of their lives.

I don't know why, but the old man who was behind the counter of the post office when we went in was in a big hurry to develop psychological problems. He fell to pieces just because the barrel of my shotgun was pointed in his general direction, apparently. I saw in the paper the next day that he was suffering from psychological problems. Not much of a diagnosis, but either way, if there's one thing you don't want, it's psychological problems.

So I went to visit him in hospital. Obviously he didn't recognize me--I'd been wearing a Santa Claus mask in the post office. (It was the perfect disguise. No one gave a second glance at three lads in Santa Claus outfits carrying sacks as they ran out of post office in the middle of the Christmas shopping crowds.)

I stopped in the doorway to the ward and looked at the old man. He was reading
Class Struggle, the Communist newspaper. Not that I've got anything against Communists as individuals. Okay, maybe I have. But I don't want to have anything to against them as individuals, I just think they're wrong. So I felt a bit guilty when I realised that I felt a lot better because the guy was reading Class Struggle. But obviously there's a big difference between feeling a bit guilty and a lot guilty. And like I said, I felt a lot better.

But I stopped doing robberies. After all, here was no guarantee the next one would be a Communist.

I can't help liking that guy. And like in this excerpt, he keeps surprising me. It's certainly interesting to follow him around in his daily life. But he has problems. Too many, really, in spite of his efforts, conscious and subconscious.

The book is set in Norway. The fishing industry is relevant to the story. It's mostly in Oslo but we also see that Svalbard is relevant. Svalbard is a set of islands in the far North where both Norway and Russia have rights to coal. (Weird, eh? Norway is the western-most part of northern Europe and Russia extends to the easternmost part of Eurasia, but in the north, Norway and Russia share a border.)

I'm going to recommend this as a really good book. Powerful even. But not universally likeable. There is violence, as you might guess, but not just shooting violence. The ending provides closure, but I wished for a better ending, and then felt weak and maybe wrong-headed for wishing that for various spoiler-y reasons.

I have mixed feelings about the book. So I don't know if I want to own it. It's in the local library, so I can probably re-read it whenever I want anyway. We'll just see if that happens or not.
linkpost comment

[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]